<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47027</link>
    <description>The HC determined that customs duty on imported bulk liquid cargo should not be exclusively based on ullage survey reports if more accurate methods, such as the B.P.T. Weigh-bridge report, are available. The public notices and CBEC circular were interpreted to permit alternative recognized methods. The petitions were allowed in part, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 81 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47027</link>
      <description>The HC determined that customs duty on imported bulk liquid cargo should not be exclusively based on ullage survey reports if more accurate methods, such as the B.P.T. Weigh-bridge report, are available. The public notices and CBEC circular were interpreted to permit alternative recognized methods. The petitions were allowed in part, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>