<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47025</link>
    <description>Refusal of full waiver of pre-deposit under the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was set aside because the authority did not consider the statutory requirement of hardship or the earlier waiver order in an identical matter. That non-consideration of relevant factors amounted to non-application of mind, rendering the order unsustainable. The matter was remitted for a fresh decision on the waiver application in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:10:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 70 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47025</link>
      <description>Refusal of full waiver of pre-deposit under the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excise Act was set aside because the authority did not consider the statutory requirement of hardship or the earlier waiver order in an identical matter. That non-consideration of relevant factors amounted to non-application of mind, rendering the order unsustainable. The matter was remitted for a fresh decision on the waiver application in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>