<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 263 revision invalid where no demonstrable error or prejudice and AO reached plausible lawful view</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92961</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the PCIT&#039;s revisionary order under section 263. The Tribunal held that jurisdiction under section 263 requires both a demonstrable error in the AO&#039;s order and that the order be prejudicial to Revenue; absent either, revision cannot be validly exercised. PCIT conceded there was no error in the assessment concerning the assessee&#039;s claim of deduction under section 80G read with section 115BAA, and the AO had reached a plausible, lawful view after considering the assessee&#039;s submissions. Consequently, no error or prejudice was established and the impugned section 263 order was unsustainable in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:00:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 263 revision invalid where no demonstrable error or prejudice and AO reached plausible lawful view</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92961</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and set aside the PCIT&#039;s revisionary order under section 263. The Tribunal held that jurisdiction under section 263 requires both a demonstrable error in the AO&#039;s order and that the order be prejudicial to Revenue; absent either, revision cannot be validly exercised. PCIT conceded there was no error in the assessment concerning the assessee&#039;s claim of deduction under section 80G read with section 115BAA, and the AO had reached a plausible, lawful view after considering the assessee&#039;s submissions. Consequently, no error or prejudice was established and the impugned section 263 order was unsustainable in law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:00:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>