<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1656 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779167</link>
    <description>Cash and cheque deposits treated as unexplained were examined on a fact-specific basis, with the assessee&#039;s plea of fraudulent bank transactions only partly accepted. The reopening challenge was not pressed and was not decided on merits. Although the lower authorities had already applied an estimated gross profit ratio, no market comparables supported the rate adopted. In the peculiar facts, the additions were further restricted to lump sum amounts for each assessment year, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1656 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779167</link>
      <description>Cash and cheque deposits treated as unexplained were examined on a fact-specific basis, with the assessee&#039;s plea of fraudulent bank transactions only partly accepted. The reopening challenge was not pressed and was not decided on merits. Although the lower authorities had already applied an estimated gross profit ratio, no market comparables supported the rate adopted. In the peculiar facts, the additions were further restricted to lump sum amounts for each assessment year, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>