<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1661 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779172</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 270A could not be sustained without considering the assessee&#039;s immunity application on merits. Because the request for immunity was not examined by the Assessing Officer or the appellate authority, the proper course was to remit the matter for fresh consideration. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the immunity application anew, with all contentions kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1661 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779172</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 270A could not be sustained without considering the assessee&#039;s immunity application on merits. Because the request for immunity was not examined by the Assessing Officer or the appellate authority, the proper course was to remit the matter for fresh consideration. The Assessing Officer was directed to decide the immunity application anew, with all contentions kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>