<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1663 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779174</link>
    <description>An ex parte dismissal of an appeal for non-prosecution was unsustainable because the first appellate authority was required to decide the appeal on merits even if the appellant was absent. As the appeal had not been examined substantively, the dismissal could not stand. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal de novo on merits after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1663 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779174</link>
      <description>An ex parte dismissal of an appeal for non-prosecution was unsustainable because the first appellate authority was required to decide the appeal on merits even if the appellant was absent. As the appeal had not been examined substantively, the dismissal could not stand. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal de novo on merits after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>