<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779176</link>
    <description>Reassessment reopening for an assessment year beyond four years required approval from the authority specified in section 151(1), namely the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as applicable. Sanction granted by the Additional Commissioner did not satisfy the statutory requirement, so the reopening lacked valid approval and was not sustainable in law. The reassessment notice was therefore quashed on the ground of invalid sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1665 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779176</link>
      <description>Reassessment reopening for an assessment year beyond four years required approval from the authority specified in section 151(1), namely the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, as applicable. Sanction granted by the Additional Commissioner did not satisfy the statutory requirement, so the reopening lacked valid approval and was not sustainable in law. The reassessment notice was therefore quashed on the ground of invalid sanction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>