<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1676 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779187</link>
    <description>ITAT, Chennai held that additions made u/s. 68 for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 were unsustainable because the credits were pre-existing opening balances or bona fide trade payables/receivables supported by audited books and VAT/GST records, not fresh unexplained credits. Consequential additions treating those entries as income were deleted. Additions in respect of multiple creditors were directed to be deleted, and the penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) based on those additions was also deleted. Appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1676 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779187</link>
      <description>ITAT, Chennai held that additions made u/s. 68 for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 were unsustainable because the credits were pre-existing opening balances or bona fide trade payables/receivables supported by audited books and VAT/GST records, not fresh unexplained credits. Consequential additions treating those entries as income were deleted. Additions in respect of multiple creditors were directed to be deleted, and the penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) based on those additions was also deleted. Appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>