<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47017</link>
    <description>The court quashed the cancellation of the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) sale permission due to procedural non-compliance, directing a re-evaluation of the petitioner&#039;s activities with a proper hearing and detailed reasoning within one month. The petitioner&#039;s right to export remains unaffected during this period. The writ application was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47017</link>
      <description>The court quashed the cancellation of the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) sale permission due to procedural non-compliance, directing a re-evaluation of the petitioner&#039;s activities with a proper hearing and detailed reasoning within one month. The petitioner&#039;s right to export remains unaffected during this period. The writ application was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>