<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1681 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779192</link>
    <description>ITAT (DEL) held that payments made to payment-gateway companies were not subject to TDS under section 194H and the assessee was not a defaulting payor under sections 201 and 201(1A). The tribunal found no principal-agent relationship, relied on relevant precedents and CBDT instruction, set aside the lower authorities&#039; order, and directed the AO to delete the demand for AY 2015-16. All grounds of appeal raised by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1681 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779192</link>
      <description>ITAT (DEL) held that payments made to payment-gateway companies were not subject to TDS under section 194H and the assessee was not a defaulting payor under sections 201 and 201(1A). The tribunal found no principal-agent relationship, relied on relevant precedents and CBDT instruction, set aside the lower authorities&#039; order, and directed the AO to delete the demand for AY 2015-16. All grounds of appeal raised by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>