<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779194</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that delayed filing of Form No. 67 does not mandate denial of foreign tax credit. The tribunal followed precedent that Rule 128(9) does not require disallowance for delay, filing Form 67 is directory not mandatory, and DTAA provisions override contrary rules. The AO was directed to grant foreign tax credit as per the filed Form 67 after verification. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779194</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that delayed filing of Form No. 67 does not mandate denial of foreign tax credit. The tribunal followed precedent that Rule 128(9) does not require disallowance for delay, filing Form 67 is directory not mandatory, and DTAA provisions override contrary rules. The AO was directed to grant foreign tax credit as per the filed Form 67 after verification. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>