https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464042 The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding the disqualification from the tender process for failure to submit the required GSTR-3B/ARN was valid. The court found GSTR-3B filing was a mandatory tender requirement and under the GST framework, GSTR-1 alone did not suffice; several bidders were similarly rejected. The HC found no perversity, malafide or arbitrariness in the authority's interpretation of the tender, no substantial public interest warranting intervention, and that further delay would harm the public exchequer, so judicial review was refused. en-us Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:36:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464042 The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding the disqualification from the tender process for failure to submit the required GSTR-3B/ARN was valid. The court found GSTR-3B filing was a mandatory tender requirement and under the GST framework, GSTR-1 alone did not suffice; several bidders were similarly rejected. The HC found no perversity, malafide or arbitrariness in the authority's interpretation of the tender, no substantial public interest warranting intervention, and that further delay would harm the public exchequer, so judicial review was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464042