<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1347 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464041</link>
    <description>The petition was dismissed as withdrawn after the respondent&#039;s counsel confirmed that any auction would be subject to the lease&#039;s terms and conditions, the court taking that assurance on record. The HC recorded the statement and, in light of it, the petitioner did not press the writ, leading to dismissal without further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 13:11:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1347 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464041</link>
      <description>The petition was dismissed as withdrawn after the respondent&#039;s counsel confirmed that any auction would be subject to the lease&#039;s terms and conditions, the court taking that assurance on record. The HC recorded the statement and, in light of it, the petitioner did not press the writ, leading to dismissal without further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>