<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision under s.263 upheld for AO&#039;s failure to disallow unpaid VAT under s.43B(a) and treat belated PF as s.2(24)(x) income</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92941</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the PCIT&#039;s revision order under s. 263, holding the AO&#039;s assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue for failing to disallow unpaid VAT under s. 43B(a) as noted in the auditor&#039;s Form 3CD and for neglecting to treat belated employee PF contribution as income under s. 2(24)(x). The PCIT&#039;s remand to the AO for verification was validated given the recorded failure of the AO to investigate these issues, warranting exercise of revisional jurisdiction. Consequently, the PCIT&#039;s direction stands and the assessee&#039;s appeal is rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision under s.263 upheld for AO&#039;s failure to disallow unpaid VAT under s.43B(a) and treat belated PF as s.2(24)(x) income</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92941</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the PCIT&#039;s revision order under s. 263, holding the AO&#039;s assessment to be erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue for failing to disallow unpaid VAT under s. 43B(a) as noted in the auditor&#039;s Form 3CD and for neglecting to treat belated employee PF contribution as income under s. 2(24)(x). The PCIT&#039;s remand to the AO for verification was validated given the recorded failure of the AO to investigate these issues, warranting exercise of revisional jurisdiction. Consequently, the PCIT&#039;s direction stands and the assessee&#039;s appeal is rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>