<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1607 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779118</link>
    <description>CESTAT held that consideration for sale/transfer of development rights constitutes a transfer of immovable property under Section 65B(44)(a)(i) and thus falls outside service tax coverage; relying on prior HC decisions treating transferable development rights as immovable property and on the collaboration agreement showing the aim was transfer of land, the tribunal quashed the impugned demand and allowed the appeal, making it unnecessary to decide other contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1607 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779118</link>
      <description>CESTAT held that consideration for sale/transfer of development rights constitutes a transfer of immovable property under Section 65B(44)(a)(i) and thus falls outside service tax coverage; relying on prior HC decisions treating transferable development rights as immovable property and on the collaboration agreement showing the aim was transfer of land, the tribunal quashed the impugned demand and allowed the appeal, making it unnecessary to decide other contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>