https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779120 AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned provisional attachment order under PMLA. The Tribunal found overwhelming documentary and banking evidence showing funds routed from SJDA to an intermediary and thence to the appellant firm by specific cheque transfers. The Directorate was properly authorized to investigate (ECIR proceedings) and investigatory scope under Section 2(na) was affirmed. Allegations of coerced statements were unsubstantiated and raised belatedly. The impugned order was not interfered with and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Sep 2025 13:07:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779120 AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned provisional attachment order under PMLA. The Tribunal found overwhelming documentary and banking evidence showing funds routed from SJDA to an intermediary and thence to the appellant firm by specific cheque transfers. The Directorate was properly authorized to investigate (ECIR proceedings) and investigatory scope under Section 2(na) was affirmed. Allegations of coerced statements were unsubstantiated and raised belatedly. The impugned order was not interfered with and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779120