https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779136 ITAT set aside the CIT(E)'s denial of registration under section 80G(5), finding that an object referring to propagation of Sanathan Dharm and developing knowledge of deities was not sufficiently religious to bar approval. The tribunal directed remand to CIT(E) to determine whether the assessee incurred religious expenditure exceeding the statutory 5% limit; if not, approval under s.80G(5) should be granted subject to other statutory conditions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779136 ITAT set aside the CIT(E)'s denial of registration under section 80G(5), finding that an object referring to propagation of Sanathan Dharm and developing knowledge of deities was not sufficiently religious to bar approval. The tribunal directed remand to CIT(E) to determine whether the assessee incurred religious expenditure exceeding the statutory 5% limit; if not, approval under s.80G(5) should be granted subject to other statutory conditions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779136