<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1626 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779137</link>
    <description>ITAT held that initiation of proceedings under s.153C was invalid because the AO&#039;s recorded satisfaction in the searched person&#039;s case-a precondition for proceeding against the assessee-was not placed on record despite requests. Consequently, the assessment order passed r/w s.153C and s.143(3) was quashed and the appeal allowed. The tribunal noted support from a CBDT circular and higher-court guidance that such proceedings must meet the prescribed satisfaction requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1626 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779137</link>
      <description>ITAT held that initiation of proceedings under s.153C was invalid because the AO&#039;s recorded satisfaction in the searched person&#039;s case-a precondition for proceeding against the assessee-was not placed on record despite requests. Consequently, the assessment order passed r/w s.153C and s.143(3) was quashed and the appeal allowed. The tribunal noted support from a CBDT circular and higher-court guidance that such proceedings must meet the prescribed satisfaction requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>