<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1627 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779138</link>
    <description>ITAT held the AO&#039;s estimation of agricultural income lacked basis and accepted the assessee&#039;s agricultural income certificate, directing the AO to estimate income at Rs. 1,00,000 per acre for 20 acres (Rs. 20,00,000) from nursery operations. In view of that estimate and absence of documentary evidence for expenses, the addition was restricted so that only a balance amount of Rs. 2,26,289 was sustained. Grounds raised by the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:27:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1627 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779138</link>
      <description>ITAT held the AO&#039;s estimation of agricultural income lacked basis and accepted the assessee&#039;s agricultural income certificate, directing the AO to estimate income at Rs. 1,00,000 per acre for 20 acres (Rs. 20,00,000) from nursery operations. In view of that estimate and absence of documentary evidence for expenses, the addition was restricted so that only a balance amount of Rs. 2,26,289 was sustained. Grounds raised by the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>