<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46992</link>
    <description>Octroi receipts, without corroborating evidence, were identified as the proposed basis for inferring clandestine removal of excisable goods, and the core question was whether that legal issue required the Court&#039;s opinion. The Tribunal was directed to prepare the statement of the case and refer the question of law to the Court, so the matter was channelled for judicial determination on the evidentiary sufficiency of octroi receipts alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 106 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46992</link>
      <description>Octroi receipts, without corroborating evidence, were identified as the proposed basis for inferring clandestine removal of excisable goods, and the core question was whether that legal issue required the Court&#039;s opinion. The Tribunal was directed to prepare the statement of the case and refer the question of law to the Court, so the matter was channelled for judicial determination on the evidentiary sufficiency of octroi receipts alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>