<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1598 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464029</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court considered whether a special leave petition against an order passed in review is maintainable, and whether a later special leave petition can be entertained after withdrawal of an earlier petition without express liberty. The Court examined the bar under Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC against appeal from an order rejecting review, as well as authorities on withdrawal of a special leave petition and the absence of merger in a non-speaking dismissal. Finding that the issue involved an important question of law with wider consequences and competing lines of authority, the Bench did not finally decide the point and directed that it be placed before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of a larger Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 17:02:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1598 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464029</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court considered whether a special leave petition against an order passed in review is maintainable, and whether a later special leave petition can be entertained after withdrawal of an earlier petition without express liberty. The Court examined the bar under Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC against appeal from an order rejecting review, as well as authorities on withdrawal of a special leave petition and the absence of merger in a non-speaking dismissal. Finding that the issue involved an important question of law with wider consequences and competing lines of authority, the Bench did not finally decide the point and directed that it be placed before the Chief Justice of India for constitution of a larger Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>