<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory one-month opportunity to resubmit TRAN-1 with corrected entries to claim transitional input tax credit</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92916</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition in part and disposed it with a mandatory direction: the respondents are ordered to enable facilities within one month to permit the petitioner to re-submit the TRAN-1 application with corrected entries and to furnish an opportunity to cure defects so the petitioner may claim transitional input tax credit for the pre-GST period. The court found the initial rejection resulted from the petitioner&#039;s erroneous data entry but held that mere procedural or software limitations do not warrant denial of substantive statutory relief; accordingly the petitioner retains the right to avail benefits under the transitional provisions upon compliance with the rectified submission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory one-month opportunity to resubmit TRAN-1 with corrected entries to claim transitional input tax credit</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92916</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition in part and disposed it with a mandatory direction: the respondents are ordered to enable facilities within one month to permit the petitioner to re-submit the TRAN-1 application with corrected entries and to furnish an opportunity to cure defects so the petitioner may claim transitional input tax credit for the pre-GST period. The court found the initial rejection resulted from the petitioner&#039;s erroneous data entry but held that mere procedural or software limitations do not warrant denial of substantive statutory relief; accordingly the petitioner retains the right to avail benefits under the transitional provisions upon compliance with the rectified submission.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>