https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779056 NCLAT (PB) allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The Tribunal erred in ignoring an additional affidavit and a letter dated 28.08.2022 (and related correspondence) bearing on whether a genuine pre-existing dispute existed between the CD and OC. The NCLAT directed the Tribunal to re-examine all documents on record, including the additional affidavit and listed letters, to determine admission of the Section 9 application. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779056 NCLAT (PB) allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. The Tribunal erred in ignoring an additional affidavit and a letter dated 28.08.2022 (and related correspondence) bearing on whether a genuine pre-existing dispute existed between the CD and OC. The NCLAT directed the Tribunal to re-examine all documents on record, including the additional affidavit and listed letters, to determine admission of the Section 9 application. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779056