<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1549 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779060</link>
    <description>Assy Guide Rail used in a motor vehicle sunroof system was treated as a specialised component of the vehicle body assembly, and its functional character, principal use, and the section and chapter notes supported classification under CTH 8708 2900 as a part and accessory of motor vehicles rather than under Chapter 76 or Heading 8302. The challenge to the advance ruling also failed because interference under section 28KA was confined to patent illegality, procedural infirmity, irrelevant considerations, or breach of natural justice, and none was established on the facts. The ruling was therefore upheld and the classification under CTH 8708 2900 left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1549 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779060</link>
      <description>Assy Guide Rail used in a motor vehicle sunroof system was treated as a specialised component of the vehicle body assembly, and its functional character, principal use, and the section and chapter notes supported classification under CTH 8708 2900 as a part and accessory of motor vehicles rather than under Chapter 76 or Heading 8302. The challenge to the advance ruling also failed because interference under section 28KA was confined to patent illegality, procedural infirmity, irrelevant considerations, or breach of natural justice, and none was established on the facts. The ruling was therefore upheld and the classification under CTH 8708 2900 left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>