<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1553 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779064</link>
    <description>ITAT (MUMBAI) held that the AO&#039;s disallowance of commission expenses was unjustified and based on conjecture; the assessee had produced documentary proofs, reconciliations and TDS compliance, and the AO failed to make proper inquiries with agents. CIT(A) had granted partial relief, but the Tribunal modified those orders and directed the AO to allow the entire commission expenses for both years, finding they were incurred for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1553 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779064</link>
      <description>ITAT (MUMBAI) held that the AO&#039;s disallowance of commission expenses was unjustified and based on conjecture; the assessee had produced documentary proofs, reconciliations and TDS compliance, and the AO failed to make proper inquiries with agents. CIT(A) had granted partial relief, but the Tribunal modified those orders and directed the AO to allow the entire commission expenses for both years, finding they were incurred for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>