<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1555 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779066</link>
    <description>ITAT held in favour of the assessee and allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit the cost of improvement claimed. The tribunal found payments under the agreement were made and fit-out work completed with possession dated 31.03.2014, after which the flat was leased, rebutting the AO&#039;s contention that improvements could not have been incurred before 27.12.2017. The CIT(A)&#039;s confirmation of disallowance was set aside as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1555 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779066</link>
      <description>ITAT held in favour of the assessee and allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit the cost of improvement claimed. The tribunal found payments under the agreement were made and fit-out work completed with possession dated 31.03.2014, after which the flat was leased, rebutting the AO&#039;s contention that improvements could not have been incurred before 27.12.2017. The CIT(A)&#039;s confirmation of disallowance was set aside as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>