https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779072 ITAT, JAIPUR - AT held that additions under s. 68 for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization could not be finally sustained without affording a hearing; noting the assessee was ex parte before the AO and CIT(A) and failed to respond to questionnaires, the Bench nonetheless restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication with one more opportunity to be heard and directed the AO to consider written submissions. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes subject to the assessee's cooperation and no frivolous adjournments. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:22:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779072 ITAT, JAIPUR - AT held that additions under s. 68 for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization could not be finally sustained without affording a hearing; noting the assessee was ex parte before the AO and CIT(A) and failed to respond to questionnaires, the Bench nonetheless restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication with one more opportunity to be heard and directed the AO to consider written submissions. The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes subject to the assessee's cooperation and no frivolous adjournments. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 20 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779072