<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1581 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779092</link>
    <description>ITAT affirmed additions disallowing the reported 4% gross profit rate and an unsecured loan, finding the assessee failed to substantiate trading figures and lender creditworthiness, but reversed additions for vendor rebate income and rent after accepting receipts and business necessity. The tribunal also deleted the adhoc addition, allowing that ground in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 08:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1581 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779092</link>
      <description>ITAT affirmed additions disallowing the reported 4% gross profit rate and an unsecured loan, finding the assessee failed to substantiate trading figures and lender creditworthiness, but reversed additions for vendor rebate income and rent after accepting receipts and business necessity. The tribunal also deleted the adhoc addition, allowing that ground in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>