<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1588 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779099</link>
    <description>A transfer of property made after initiation of assessment proceedings and during the pendency of proceedings under the Income-tax Act was treated as void against the Department&#039;s tax claim under Section 281. The earlier Supreme Court ruling on the unamended provision was held inapplicable because the statutory language had changed. The plea that the purchaser was bona fide was not suitable for conclusive determination in writ proceedings, as that question required fuller factual adjudication and could, if at all, be established in a civil suit. The challenge to the attachment therefore failed and writ relief was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1588 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779099</link>
      <description>A transfer of property made after initiation of assessment proceedings and during the pendency of proceedings under the Income-tax Act was treated as void against the Department&#039;s tax claim under Section 281. The earlier Supreme Court ruling on the unamended provision was held inapplicable because the statutory language had changed. The plea that the purchaser was bona fide was not suitable for conclusive determination in writ proceedings, as that question required fuller factual adjudication and could, if at all, be established in a civil suit. The challenge to the attachment therefore failed and writ relief was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>