<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court keeps in place Trump funding freeze that threatens billions of dollars in foreign aid</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=57124</link>
    <description>The core issue is whether a president may use a pocket rescission-a late rescission notice submitted near the fiscal year&#039;s end-to withhold congressionally appropriated foreign aid by relying on congressional inaction during the statutory window. A district judge found the action likely unlawful, but that ruling has been stayed through emergency applications to the Supreme Court, which temporarily extended the freeze after a federal appeals court declined to maintain the district court&#039;s order. The case raises whether and how courts can review executive non spending of appropriated funds and the limits of presidential spending authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 02:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 02:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court keeps in place Trump funding freeze that threatens billions of dollars in foreign aid</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=57124</link>
      <description>The core issue is whether a president may use a pocket rescission-a late rescission notice submitted near the fiscal year&#039;s end-to withhold congressionally appropriated foreign aid by relying on congressional inaction during the statutory window. A district judge found the action likely unlawful, but that ruling has been stayed through emergency applications to the Supreme Court, which temporarily extended the freeze after a federal appeals court declined to maintain the district court&#039;s order. The case raises whether and how courts can review executive non spending of appropriated funds and the limits of presidential spending authority.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 02:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=57124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>