https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464004 A village officer certificate and the absence of any competing claimant were sufficient to establish that A.P. Thomas and Tomy Peter were the same person, so the Tribunal's remand on identity was unsustainable. A petition was not defeated by an incorrect reference to Article 227 because a wrong mention of the provision does not invalidate an otherwise maintainable proceeding; it was treated as one under Article 226 and the objection was rejected. Under Section 76 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, the award in favour of the depositor was deemed executable as a civil court decree, so the execution challenge failed and the award was restored for execution. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:09:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464004 A village officer certificate and the absence of any competing claimant were sufficient to establish that A.P. Thomas and Tomy Peter were the same person, so the Tribunal's remand on identity was unsustainable. A petition was not defeated by an incorrect reference to Article 227 because a wrong mention of the provision does not invalidate an otherwise maintainable proceeding; it was treated as one under Article 226 and the objection was rejected. Under Section 76 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, the award in favour of the depositor was deemed executable as a civil court decree, so the execution challenge failed and the award was restored for execution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464004