<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1402 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464005</link>
    <description>An appellant who filed an application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 sought withdrawal of its central excise appeal, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous application was disposed of accordingly, reflecting that the matter ended on withdrawal rather than on adjudication of the substantive tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1402 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464005</link>
      <description>An appellant who filed an application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 sought withdrawal of its central excise appeal, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous application was disposed of accordingly, reflecting that the matter ended on withdrawal rather than on adjudication of the substantive tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>