<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464009</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal upholding CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of interest disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(ii), finding the assessees&#039; own capital and reserves exceeded investments so funds were presumed interest-free per HC precedents. The Tribunal directed the AO to limit disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) to the amount of exempt dividend income received (Rs.32,400) for the year, and otherwise affirmed the appellate findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1971 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464009</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal upholding CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of interest disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(ii), finding the assessees&#039; own capital and reserves exceeded investments so funds were presumed interest-free per HC precedents. The Tribunal directed the AO to limit disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) to the amount of exempt dividend income received (Rs.32,400) for the year, and otherwise affirmed the appellate findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>