https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464021 Review jurisdiction cannot be used to re-argue matters already considered, and interference is limited to cases showing jurisdictional infirmity or an error apparent on the face of the record. The court noted that the earlier order had already examined the rival submissions and found that Centrica India Offshore Private Limited did not apply to the facts. As no such apparent error or jurisdictional defect was demonstrated, the review petitions were not maintainable on the grounds raised and no interference was warranted. en-us Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:09:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464021 Review jurisdiction cannot be used to re-argue matters already considered, and interference is limited to cases showing jurisdictional infirmity or an error apparent on the face of the record. The court noted that the earlier order had already examined the rival submissions and found that Centrica India Offshore Private Limited did not apply to the facts. As no such apparent error or jurisdictional defect was demonstrated, the review petitions were not maintainable on the grounds raised and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464021