<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1488 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464022</link>
    <description>Treaty shopping was not made out on the facts, and the Tax Residency Certificate could not ordinarily be questioned or disregarded except on limited grounds. The court found no factual foundation to depart from that binding principle, so no substantial question of law arose and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 20:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1488 - DELHI HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464022</link>
      <description>Treaty shopping was not made out on the facts, and the Tax Residency Certificate could not ordinarily be questioned or disregarded except on limited grounds. The court found no factual foundation to depart from that binding principle, so no substantial question of law arose and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>