<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 1401 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464003</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s review petitions challenging orders that had upheld the assessee on issues of TDS under s.195 and disallowance under s.40(a)(i) in respect of payments (reimbursements of salary and other expenditures) to a foreign entity. The court held earlier substantial questions were decided in the assessee&#039;s favour by prior HC judgments, the review petitions against those orders were dismissed, and therefore the impugned orders require no interference; review petitions stand dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 18:04:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 1401 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464003</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s review petitions challenging orders that had upheld the assessee on issues of TDS under s.195 and disallowance under s.40(a)(i) in respect of payments (reimbursements of salary and other expenditures) to a foreign entity. The court held earlier substantial questions were decided in the assessee&#039;s favour by prior HC judgments, the review petitions against those orders were dismissed, and therefore the impugned orders require no interference; review petitions stand dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=464003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>