<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46952</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the manufacturing of &quot;densified wood&quot; by ASCU. The Court criticized the Tribunal for relying on materials from one party and emphasized the need to consider only relevant evidence. The Court clarified that the decision applied only to ASCU and not other parties involved. The Tribunal&#039;s order was overturned, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration, with the Appeals revived for further review. The Court also ruled in favor of the Revenue Appeals on the issue of the extended period of limitation, leading to the disposal of the Appeals with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 78 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46952</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving the manufacturing of &quot;densified wood&quot; by ASCU. The Court criticized the Tribunal for relying on materials from one party and emphasized the need to consider only relevant evidence. The Court clarified that the decision applied only to ASCU and not other parties involved. The Tribunal&#039;s order was overturned, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration, with the Appeals revived for further review. The Court also ruled in favor of the Revenue Appeals on the issue of the extended period of limitation, leading to the disposal of the Appeals with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>