https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778979 CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding the Department erred in clubbing co-owners' rental income without issuing them notice and in invoking extended limitation. The appellant had supplied co-owners' service tax registrations, PANs and IT returns, and the Tribunal found Revenue should have controverted those records and notified the co-owners. The Tribunal also held the dispute raised interpretational issues rendering demands for October 2007-March 2008 and April 2008-March 2013 time-barred; therefore duties, interest and penalties were unsustainable. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:26:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778979 CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding the Department erred in clubbing co-owners' rental income without issuing them notice and in invoking extended limitation. The appellant had supplied co-owners' service tax registrations, PANs and IT returns, and the Tribunal found Revenue should have controverted those records and notified the co-owners. The Tribunal also held the dispute raised interpretational issues rendering demands for October 2007-March 2008 and April 2008-March 2013 time-barred; therefore duties, interest and penalties were unsustainable. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 23 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778979