<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1517 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779028</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the delayed SLPs and upheld the HC&#039;s quashing of assessment notices issued under s.153C. The HC had held that powers under s.153C are confined to years to which seized material relates or may influence, and absent material casting doubt on estimation of income for specific years, the AO cannot invoke s.153C. The SC found the delay in filing SLPs unexplained and, on merits, saw no reason to interfere with the HC&#039;s conclusion; the impugned notices were therefore quashed and the petitions dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1517 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779028</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the delayed SLPs and upheld the HC&#039;s quashing of assessment notices issued under s.153C. The HC had held that powers under s.153C are confined to years to which seized material relates or may influence, and absent material casting doubt on estimation of income for specific years, the AO cannot invoke s.153C. The SC found the delay in filing SLPs unexplained and, on merits, saw no reason to interfere with the HC&#039;s conclusion; the impugned notices were therefore quashed and the petitions dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>