https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779036 The HC set aside the impugned order that retrospectively cancelled the petitioner's GST registration from 1 July 2017, finding the show-cause notice did not propose retrospective cancellation and such retrospective effect would be contrary to law. The court held cancellation should not be retrospective where the SCN does not seek that relief and directed that cancellation, if any, be from the date of issuance of the SCN. The petitioner was permitted to file replies to the two SCNs dated 27 May 2024 and 11 June 2024; petition disposed. en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:26:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779036 The HC set aside the impugned order that retrospectively cancelled the petitioner's GST registration from 1 July 2017, finding the show-cause notice did not propose retrospective cancellation and such retrospective effect would be contrary to law. The court held cancellation should not be retrospective where the SCN does not seek that relief and directed that cancellation, if any, be from the date of issuance of the SCN. The petitioner was permitted to file replies to the two SCNs dated 27 May 2024 and 11 June 2024; petition disposed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779036