<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1761 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463992</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI held that where the assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs.2,000 and had not disallowed any expenditure against it, Rule 8D disallowance could only be restricted to the amount of exempt income. Relying on the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order for the assessee and the Delhi HC decision in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd., the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 19:05:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1761 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463992</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI held that where the assessee earned exempt dividend income of Rs.2,000 and had not disallowed any expenditure against it, Rule 8D disallowance could only be restricted to the amount of exempt income. Relying on the Tribunal&#039;s earlier order for the assessee and the Delhi HC decision in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd., the tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee and against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>