<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46931</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the welding of headers with sheets in the manufacturing process results in a new product with distinct characteristics, making them marketable products. The failure to recognize this led to the overturning of the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court also found that the deliberate concealment of material facts by the Respondents amounted to conscious withholding of information. The issue of liability for duty payment was remitted back to the Tribunal for further examination to determine the responsible party. The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders, allowing the appeals with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 64 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46931</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the welding of headers with sheets in the manufacturing process results in a new product with distinct characteristics, making them marketable products. The failure to recognize this led to the overturning of the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court also found that the deliberate concealment of material facts by the Respondents amounted to conscious withholding of information. The issue of liability for duty payment was remitted back to the Tribunal for further examination to determine the responsible party. The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s orders, allowing the appeals with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>