https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463978 ITAT, Mumbai allowed the miscellaneous application under s.254(2) after finding a mistake apparent on record under s.254(4). The Tribunal had adjudicated a total disallowance of Rs.41.68 crores under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(i) but omitted separate findings on interest on specific and general borrowings. The MA was permitted for the limited purpose of deciding Grounds No.2 and No.3 of the revenue to address those omitted issues. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 10:50:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463978 ITAT, Mumbai allowed the miscellaneous application under s.254(2) after finding a mistake apparent on record under s.254(4). The Tribunal had adjudicated a total disallowance of Rs.41.68 crores under s.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(i) but omitted separate findings on interest on specific and general borrowings. The MA was permitted for the limited purpose of deciding Grounds No.2 and No.3 of the revenue to address those omitted issues. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463978