<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2143 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463982</link>
    <description>Share application money was routed through group companies on the same day, shown as invested share capital on behalf of foreign entities and received on a rotational basis, leading to tax treatment by applying a 0.5% commission on turnover. The court noted that the assessee had been asked to produce books of account, bills, vouchers and bank statements, but the assessment order did not deal with that requisition. As the maintenance of proper books of account remained unverified, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to examine the books and record a finding. The court also observed that no question of law arose on the concurrent factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2143 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463982</link>
      <description>Share application money was routed through group companies on the same day, shown as invested share capital on behalf of foreign entities and received on a rotational basis, leading to tax treatment by applying a 0.5% commission on turnover. The court noted that the assessee had been asked to produce books of account, bills, vouchers and bank statements, but the assessment order did not deal with that requisition. As the maintenance of proper books of account remained unverified, the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to examine the books and record a finding. The court also observed that no question of law arose on the concurrent factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>