<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1503 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463983</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under Section 148 was held time-barred where it was signed on 31 March 2021 but communicated on 1 April 2021. The Court followed its earlier precedent, affirmed on appeal, and noted that the revenue could not distinguish those decisions on the facts. On that basis, the reassessment initiation and the consequential proceeding were found unsustainable and were quashed with all consequential legal effects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1503 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463983</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under Section 148 was held time-barred where it was signed on 31 March 2021 but communicated on 1 April 2021. The Court followed its earlier precedent, affirmed on appeal, and noted that the revenue could not distinguish those decisions on the facts. On that basis, the reassessment initiation and the consequential proceeding were found unsustainable and were quashed with all consequential legal effects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>