https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463985 Reassessment notices and orders were treated as covered by an earlier binding Bombay HC decision in Hexaware Technologies Limited, and the consequential demand and penalty notices could not survive. Because the controversy for the different assessment years was accepted by both sides as governed by that precedent, the impugned reassessment proceedings were quashed and set aside, along with any reassessment orders, demand notices, and penalty notices arising from them. The petitions were disposed of in favour of the petitioners, with liberty to raise any contention not covered by the earlier decision if required. en-us Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:47:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463985 Reassessment notices and orders were treated as covered by an earlier binding Bombay HC decision in Hexaware Technologies Limited, and the consequential demand and penalty notices could not survive. Because the controversy for the different assessment years was accepted by both sides as governed by that precedent, the impugned reassessment proceedings were quashed and set aside, along with any reassessment orders, demand notices, and penalty notices arising from them. The petitions were disposed of in favour of the petitioners, with liberty to raise any contention not covered by the earlier decision if required. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463985