<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1634 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463987</link>
    <description>HC held that, according to earlier HC precedent, payments of External Development Charges to a government-linked development authority fall within Section 194C (payment to a contractor) rather than Section 194I. However, because the revenue had relied only on Section 194I before the Tribunal, the HC declined to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant/revenue was granted liberty to pursue other remedies consistent with the earlier HC ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:47:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1634 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463987</link>
      <description>HC held that, according to earlier HC precedent, payments of External Development Charges to a government-linked development authority fall within Section 194C (payment to a contractor) rather than Section 194I. However, because the revenue had relied only on Section 194I before the Tribunal, the HC declined to disturb the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant/revenue was granted liberty to pursue other remedies consistent with the earlier HC ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>