<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46927</link>
    <description>Where the duty structure contemplated levy at only one stage, exemption of the final polyester fibre product did not extinguish liability at the intermediate tow stage if duty had not been paid at the fibre stage. The Court held that the Revenue could validly demand duty on tow, and rejected the contention that exemption under Notification No. 191/85 displaced that liability. It further held that Notification No. 76/92 was a fresh exemption and, absent express words, could not operate retrospectively or as a merely clarificatory measure. The demand was sustained and the retrospective effect plea failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46927</link>
      <description>Where the duty structure contemplated levy at only one stage, exemption of the final polyester fibre product did not extinguish liability at the intermediate tow stage if duty had not been paid at the fibre stage. The Court held that the Revenue could validly demand duty on tow, and rejected the contention that exemption under Notification No. 191/85 displaced that liability. It further held that Notification No. 76/92 was a fresh exemption and, absent express words, could not operate retrospectively or as a merely clarificatory measure. The demand was sustained and the retrospective effect plea failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>