<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1409 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778920</link>
    <description>Property can be provisionally attached under PMLA where material shows it is derived, directly or indirectly, from scheduled criminal activity, including through shell entities, diverted loan funds and layered routing. The Tribunal held that the wider definition of proceeds of crime covers value traceable through subsequent transactions, so the challenge to attachment failed. It also held that provisional attachment is not dependent on completion of investigation or prior filing and testing of the prosecution complaint; attachment may rest on material already in the authorised officer&#039;s possession. The confirmation of provisional attachment was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2025 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=854401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1409 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778920</link>
      <description>Property can be provisionally attached under PMLA where material shows it is derived, directly or indirectly, from scheduled criminal activity, including through shell entities, diverted loan funds and layered routing. The Tribunal held that the wider definition of proceeds of crime covers value traceable through subsequent transactions, so the challenge to attachment failed. It also held that provisional attachment is not dependent on completion of investigation or prior filing and testing of the prosecution complaint; attachment may rest on material already in the authorised officer&#039;s possession. The confirmation of provisional attachment was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>