<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 92 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46919</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the show cause notice issued to the assessee was time-barred due to the absence of wilful suppression, fraud, or misrepresentation. The demands based on the notice were quashed, potentially leading to refunds if applicable under the law. However, the classification issue was decided against the assessee based on precedent. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 92 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46919</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the show cause notice issued to the assessee was time-barred due to the absence of wilful suppression, fraud, or misrepresentation. The demands based on the notice were quashed, potentially leading to refunds if applicable under the law. However, the classification issue was decided against the assessee based on precedent. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>